AD OBSERVER · AD WATCH · ADBUZZ · ADVERTISING · AGENCY NEWS · BRAND ENDORSEMENTS · BRAND WARS · BRANDS · BREAKING NEWS · DIGITAL MARKETING · SPORTS BRANDS · TELEVISION

[BREAKING NEWS!] #RIO2016: OLYMPIC COMMITTEE PLANS TO SUE BRANDS THAT TWEET HASHTAGS. READ MORE NOW:

ARE YOU A BRAND? or your AGENCY has been working day and night on a bad @$$ digital campaign towards the upcoming summer Olympics in Rio? BAD NEWS! Prepare for legal trouble.

The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) just sent letters to companies that sponsor Olympic athletes warning them not to use the hashtags ‘#Rio2016’ or ‘#TeamUSA’.

Sponsors are also encouraged to avoid using ‘Olympic,’ ‘Olympian’ and ‘Go for the gold’ as well as various other phrases, says ESPN.

The reason for the USOC’s terse guidelines? Sponsors of athletes are not necessarily USOC or International Olympic Committe (IOC) sponsors. Unless a company has a business relationship with one or both committees, they may end up in court.

But what constitutes sponsorship? Sally Bergesen, CEO of running equipment company Oiselle says “it costs $300,000 to send an Olympian to the Games, and for our athletes, the USOC has reimbursed them about 1 percent of that cost. Is that supporting them?”

USOC chief marketing officer Lisa Baird says “we need to give sponsors exclusivity to our intellectual property that is protected by U.S. law.”

And what if a family business decided to sponsor an athlete? Would the USOC in turn sue someone’s LLC if the company tweeted about the owner’s daughter in the Summer games? Will those who helped crowdfund a swimmer’s way to Rio be sued?

Oddly, an athlete and non-sponsor of the USOC can support one another during the Olympics — but neither can mention the games. To that, you may see your favorite athlete discuss patriotism and sports in a commercial, but if the company they’re representing isn’t an USOC sponsor, they can’t mention the Olympics.

And in an even odder twist of fate, those ads were once prohibited during the games, but the IOC and USOC are making an exception this year — so long as the ads began running in March and last through the games.

It’s a ‘relaxation’ of the IOC’s Rule 40, which prohibits athletes and sponsors from discussing their relationship during the games. Ads still have to be approved by the committees, though. When asked how many companies were dedicating ad space to the five-month window, Baird would only say it was a “significant number.”

And it gets worse. The USOC will let a media entity (like The Next Web) use images, tweets or posts from its official channels — but not brands. According to ESPN, the letter says companies sponsoring athletes “cannot reference any Olympic results, cannot share or repost anything from the official Olympic account and cannot use any pictures taken at the Olympics.”

The IOC and USOC are free to trademark any hashtag they like, of course (we’ll just make up another) — but are Olympic results really intellectual property? Further, prohibiting “any pictures taken at the Olympics” from being used is obscene.

So if you don’t hear much about the Olympics from brands this Summer, don’t be surprised. A tweet is almost never worth a lawsuit.

THIS MAY ALSO BE OUR LAST POST ABOUT RIO 2016 OLYMPIC GAMES.

The only media partner approved in Nigeria is Red Saphire and Hiptv.

Read more about the NIGERIA OMP ENDORSEMENT HERE

See you after the games.

Via: thenextweb.

©thebrandradio 2016. All rights reserved.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s